Rayburn Law Office 4905 SW Griffith Park Dr., # 105
Beaverton, OR 97005 
Tel 503-968-5820 
Fax 503-670-0441
NEWSLETTER
Employment September 4, 2010
 
Employment
Personal Injury
 

The Relationship Among the ADA, the FMLA, and Workers' Compensation Laws

When employees become disabled, sick, or injured, there are a number of laws and programs that could potentially affect employers' ...(more)

 

Restaurants Must Pay FICA Taxes on Employee Tip Amounts

A tip or "gratuity" for tax purposes is defined as a non-compulsory, additional payment for services, usually to a waiter ...(more)

 

Suing an Employer Instead of Filing a Workers' Compensation Claim

Workplace injuries are usually followed by a Workers' Compensation claim filed on behalf of the injured employee. However, in certain ...(more)

 

Retirement Benefit Distribution Upon Divorce

Upon divorce, all debts, property and assets must be divided between the spouses according to applicable percentages set by state ...(more)

 

Employment Law In The News

Abercrombie & Fitch sued over Muslim scarf

Wal-Mart Asks Supreme Court to Hear Bias Suit

Mich. judge lets Hooters weight bias suits proceed

Payrolls Increase in 37 U.S. States, Led by Michigan

Some job-screening tactics challenged as illegal

Protection Against Employment Discrimination Based on Bankruptcy


Section 525 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code prohibits employers from firing or otherwise discriminating against a person who "is or has been a debtor" in bankruptcy.  This anti-discrimination provision of the Code is intended to further the goal of allowing debtors who have formally filed for bankruptcy to make a "fresh start."
 
Scope of Protection
The prohibition against employment discrimination based on bankruptcy applies to both government employers and private employers, and is meant to protect the following categories of people:
  • An individual who is or has been a debtor
  • An individual who has been insolvent prior to the commencement of a bankruptcy case, or during a case before grant or denial of a discharge
  • An individual who has not paid a debt that is dischargeable in a bankruptcy case, or that has been discharged under the Bankruptcy Act
Intent to File Does Not Warrant Debtor Protection
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has set forth a bright line rule for determining exactly which employees are protected by Section 525.  Specifically, the court held that an employer who fires a debtor employee after learning of the debtor employee's intent to file bankruptcy does not violate the Code.  Rather, protection only extends to employees who have already filed for bankruptcy.
 
In the aforementioned case, the debtor was hospitalized and incurred substantial medical expenses at a hospital where he was also employed.  The debtor was ultimately unable to pay off his debt and informed the hospital that he was planning to file for bankruptcy.  Subsequently, the hospital fired the debtor.  The court ruled that the debtor did not have a valid action against the hospital for unlawful termination under Section 525, because the Code's protection extends only to an individual who "is or has been a debtor."  In this case, however, the hospital fired the debtor before the debtor filed for bankruptcy.  As such, Section 525 did not apply. 

© 2010 NextClient.com, Inc.  All rights reserved.